<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My first attempt at HDR Processing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thephotoenthusiast.com/archives/21/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thephotoenthusiast.com/archives/21</link>
	<description>Gainesville Florida Children &#38; Family Portrait Photography</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Bailey</title>
		<link>http://thephotoenthusiast.com/archives/21#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephotoenthusiast.com/archives/21#comment-3</guid>
		<description>OMG, Laurel, my pot filller never looked so good! I tend to like how Photoshop processes HDR -  I find I can control and eliminate the edge artifacts a little better. I think the Photoshop version of the Heineken Bottle (on my new art deco table ;-) with a little boost in contrast and saturation would win hands down. But then I tend to like HDR from a more realist approach.

Cheers,
Aaron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG, Laurel, my pot filller never looked so good! I tend to like how Photoshop processes HDR -  I find I can control and eliminate the edge artifacts a little better. I think the Photoshop version of the Heineken Bottle (on my new art deco table <img src='http://thephotoenthusiast.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> with a little boost in contrast and saturation would win hands down. But then I tend to like HDR from a more realist approach.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Aaron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
