<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review - Sto-Fen Omni Bounce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thephotoenthusiast.com/archives/119/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thephotoenthusiast.com/archives/119</link>
	<description>Gainesville Florida Children &#38; Family Portrait Photography</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://thephotoenthusiast.com/archives/119#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 21:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephotoenthusiast.com/archives/119#comment-647</guid>
		<description>Hi Laurel,

Are the shots of your son labelled correctly?  The first photo says it's without the Omni-Bounce, but the lighting is a lot softer and more even than the second photo which is labelled as being with the Omni-Bounce and looks to be quite harshly lit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Laurel,</p>
<p>Are the shots of your son labelled correctly?  The first photo says it&#8217;s without the Omni-Bounce, but the lighting is a lot softer and more even than the second photo which is labelled as being with the Omni-Bounce and looks to be quite harshly lit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
